Facts About valid marriage pakistani case law Revealed
Facts About valid marriage pakistani case law Revealed
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and utilize Section 302, emphasizing the importance of a fair and just legal system. It is essential for society to understand the gravity of this offense plus the need for stringent punishment to deter probable offenders and ensure justice to the victims and their people.
4. It has been noticed by this Court that there can be a delay of someday in the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained from the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness with the alleged incidence as well as the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of the petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened being the real brothers of the deceased but they did not respond in the least on the confessional statements on the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, just one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is no explanation as to why her arrest was not effected after making of your alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on a great number of occasions that extra judicial confession of the accused is usually a weak type of evidence which may very well be manoeuvred through the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution is also counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word concerning existence of some light on the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners collectively over a motorcycle check here at four.
Note: Please fill any subject and Click on Search button, if you do not know the complete information please leave industry blank.
“Making certain the precision of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple respected sources is essential for reliable legal research.”
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It's also a properly-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Upholding Justice: The application with the legislation and also the subsequent punishment with the guilty party offer a perception of closure and justice to the victim’s family and loved types.
nine. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above mentioned order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected towards the death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a potential fine.
Alternative Punishment: In a few cases, the court might have the discretion to award life imprisonment as an alternative to the death penalty. Life imprisonment involves the offender spending the remainder of their life powering bars without the possibility of parole or early release.
this Court is remaining with no option but to direct the respondents to inform the promotion of the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
What's more, it addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and 120 of your Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to determine a commission of internationally known and identified researchers to review and rule on foreseeable future grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power traces.